ECHR McDonald V McDonald

Finally, Some Relief for Residential Landlords

After a six year sojourn through the judicial system, the highest court in the land has finally confirmed that the eviction of a tenant by a private landlord on the expiry of an AST does not amount to a breach of the tenant’s human rights. (McDonald v McDonald [2016]).

Article 8 of the much maligned European Convention on Human Rights states that,
everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence

On this basis Ms McDonald, the tenant of a house owned by her parents but which had been repossessed by the lender, sought to resist section 21 possession proceedings on the basis that forcing her to leave her home amounted to an infringement of her human rights. Ms McDonald was something of a special case, having to contend with the affects of an emotionally unstable personality disorder.

That notwithstanding, the Supreme Court, having first consulted the jurisprudence of its Strasbourg brethren, decided that the Convention was intended to regulate relations between citizens and their government; not to interfere with the ordinary contractual relationship between one citizen and another. The Court emphasised that the balance of the contractual rights and responsibilities between a private landlord and their tenant had been enshrined in legislation passed by a democratically elected government. As such, Article 8 could have no application to alter that arrangement.

The relief for private landlords is not shared by the public sector however. Landlords such as local authorities, housing associations and other public bodies are vulnerable to claims brought under section 8, meaning that it can prove very difficult for them to evict their tenants. Mrs May’s stated intention to scrap the Human Rights Act, and with it the application of the European Convention in UK domestic law, can’t come soon enough for public sector landlords.

Share

Roderick Campbell

Partner, Head of Commercial Property

Rod joined Hart Brown as a trainee in 1983, qualified in 1985 and became a partner in 1988. Rod has specialised in property law for...

Partner, Head of Commercial Property

Roderick Campbell

Rod joined Hart Brown as a trainee in 1983, qualified in 1985 and became a partner in 1988.

Rod has specialised in property law for over 20 years concentrating on commercial property for the last 7 years. He handles a broad range of commercial transactions for both businesses and individuals. He has developed a particular expertise in dealing with restrictive covenants, options, conditional contracts and overage.

He is a member of the Law Society Property Group, the LawNet Commercial Property Group and Mensa. In order to further enhance his knowledge and skills in 2007 Rod took on the arduous task of studying for, and passing with Distinction, an LL.M Masters Degree in Advanced Commercial Property Law through Northumbria University. He achieved the highest combined score with his first 4 assignments and was awarded top prize by Butterworths/Lexis Nexis.

In 2008 he published a book on “Methods of Securing Development Land Overage”.

Roderick’s clients regularly describe him as “very good to deal with”, “clear, direct, straightforward, efficient and effective.” Another client commented: "Roderick Campbell provided extremely helpful, insightful, and totally professional advice. He was much more useful than other solicitors involved in the transaction."

His most memorable case was an Option Agreement concerning an M25 service area which lasted for some 12 years.