Financial considerations in divorce – who gets what?

According to the Law Commission, the current law does not “provide a cohesive framework in which parties to a divorce or dissolution can expect fair and sufficiently certain outcomes.” The reason for this is the wide-ranging discretion contained in the current law, which allows judges significant scope for interpreting the statutes.

Before examining the proposals in the review, this blog will consider the current law governing financial considerations in divorce.

Current provisions for financial settlements in divorce

Financial settlements in divorce are based on the principle that there should be a fair division. The law establishing this is contained in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (the “Act”). Whilst the provisions indicate that they should be fair, that does not mean there must be a 50/50 split.

Section 25 of the Act introduces many matters to which the court must have regard when exercising its powers in relation to matrimonial financial settlements upon divorce. The court must consider:

  • Each party’s income, earning capacity, property and other financial resources. The judge will consider each party’s resources now and for the foreseeable future.
  • The financial needs, obligations and responsibilities of each party.
  • The standard of living the family enjoyed during the marriage.
  • The parties’ ages and how long they were married.
  • Whether either party had a physical or mental disability.
  • What contribution each party has made or is likely to make to the family’s welfare in the foreseeable future. This includes looking after the home or caring for the family.
  • How each party has conducted themselves. This applies if the conduct is such that, in the court’s opinion, it would be inequitable to ignore it.
  • The value of each party to any benefit they will lose due to the divorce.

Further provisions in relation to children:

The court must consider the financial needs of the children of the family in resolving matrimonial financial matters. The first consideration of the court is for children of the family under the age of 18 years.

The court should consider:

  • The financial needs of the child.
  • The child’s financial resources, including any income, earning capacity and property.
  • If the child has a physical or mental disability.
  • The child’s education: current and expected education requirements.
  • Any of the considerations discussed above between the parties in so far as they relate to the child.

And, in respect of children who are not children of one of the parties:

  • Whether the party who is not the natural parent assumed any responsibility, the basis on which that was done and what, if anything, they contributed to the child’s maintenance and how that contribution went on, and
  • Whether they did that in the knowledge the child was not their own, and
  • The liability of any other person to maintain that child.

When the court weighs these wide-ranging provisions, it might conclude in the interests of fairness that an unequal split of assets on divorce should favour one of the parties.

The Civil Partnership Act 2004 contains provisions that mirror those in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and apply to the dissolution of a civil partnership.

The Law Commission and financial considerations in divorce:

The Law Commission has conducted a detailed review of the law. It has concluded that “it is not possible for an individual going through a divorce to understand, by reading statute, how their case will be decided. The law lacks certainty and accessibility to an extent that could be argued is inconsistent with the rule of law.” In other words, the Law Commission believes this area of law badly needs remediation and consolidation.

On 18 December 2024, the Law Commission published a Scoping Report. This is a detailed report, and it discusses four possible models for reforming the law:

  • Codify the existing law.
  • Codify the law and provide statutory reform on discrete issues (for example, pre-nuptial agreements).
  • Introduce a set of underpinning principles and objectives to guide the court’s discretion.
  • Create a ‘matrimonial property regime’ that will provide rules for dividing up property on divorce, with the court’s discretion strictly confined.

The Commission believes it is essential to introduce a degree of certainty into divorce proceedings regarding financial matters.

To discuss this, or any other related matter with Andrea directly, please call 01483 887766, email info@hartbrown.co.uk or start a live chat today.

*This is not legal advice; it is intended to provide information of general interest about current legal issues.

Share

Andrea Boulter

Senior Associate, Family Law

Andrea is a Senior Associate Solicitor in the Family Law Department. She qualified as a Solicitor in 1990 after reading law at Nottingham Trent University....

Senior Associate, Family Law

Andrea Boulter

Andrea is a Senior Associate Solicitor in the Family Law Department. She qualified as a Solicitor in 1990 after reading law at Nottingham Trent University. She has worked as a Family Law Solicitor in Surrey, Hampshire and London and joined Hart Brown in 2025.

Her practice involves advising on all aspects of family law and in particular, the financial aspects of divorce with a particular interest in cases involving capital gains tax and pension sharing. She also has extensive experience in negotiating and litigating financial settlements within a family breakdown situation. Her work includes advising family law clients in relation to financial matters to enable them to reach a negotiated settlement.

Andrea has a particular interest in cases involving family owned properties, inherited wealth, as well as businesses and pensions. She has extensive experience in representing clients from all areas of the community. She also deals with matters in relation to pre-nuptial agreements, deeds of separation and agreements in relation to cohabitation.

Andrea also assists clients in relation to children matters, particularly in relation to child arrangements within applications under the Children Act 1989. She has extensive experience in representing parents and wider family relatives and has considerable experience in acting in relation to issues of child protection and relocation of children abroad. She is aware of the sensitivity and extensive needs of children within a family breakdown situation. She has a particular concern for children with special educational needs.

Andrea frequently interacts with CAFCASS. CAFCASS is the department of the Family Court Service that undertakes child safeguarding assessments in children court cases. CAFCASS also represents children in complex cases.

Andrea has had extensive experience throughout her career in relation to the protection of clients where there has been a difficulty with domestic abuse. Such abuse can include coercive and controlling conduct by one family member against another including financial misconduct. Andrea can assist clients in relation to obtaining protective injunctions, such as non-molestation and occupation orders or financial freezing orders under S37 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, as well as signposting clients to obtain wider help within the community for practical support.

Andrea has been a member of Resolution for over 30 years. Resolution is the national organisation for family lawyers and other professionals involved within the resolution of family disputes. She is committed to the Resolution Code of Practice. Andrea is an experienced advocate within all areas of family law. Andrea has previously served on the committees for Surrey Resolution.

Andrea’s aim is to advise her family law clients carefully in relation to the variety of options that they have open to them in a relationship breakdown situation. She emphasizes the importance of collaborative and constructive communications with other family lawyers within our surrounding legal community.

Andrea is very much aware of the financial challenges and concerns for family law clients of all ages going through a relationship breakdown. She aims to provide legal and practical advice and representation that enables her clients to move forward in their lives as effectively and carefully as can be achieved.